![]() The Facebook post fails to observe this change. While the Flag Code used to be under Title 36, it was re-codified in 1998, according to the Congressional Research Service. The first, he said, was that the post notes the incorrect administrative citation for the actual flag code. Peter Ansoff is president of the North American Vexillological Association, an organization that bills itself as the "world’s largest organization of flag enthusiasts and scholars." Vexillology is the study of flags.Īnsoff told PolitiFact in a phone interview that there are two key discrepancies with the post. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.) ![]() The June 14 post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. "The flag should never have placed on it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture or drawing of any nature (including discoloration)," the post continued. The post incorrectly cites section 176 (located in Title 36) as the portion of the code that it claims the black and white flag violates. flag resembles the American flag, except it bears black and white stripes with the stars affixed to a black background. A Facebook post showing a side-by-side comparison of the American flag and a flag used to express support for police officers refers to the latter as a "gang symbol," and implies it violates the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |